Contract Grazing
15 min read
Contract grazing of heifers involves the collaboration between a dairy farmer and a grazier. It is important to have clear communication and a solid animal health programme. Always use a grazing contract, agreeing clear communication, mutual benefits, and solid health programmes. Contracts also include managing underweight livestock and selecting a fair fee method for grazing. These factors will ensure a successful partnership and an enhanced livestock performance.
Successful contract heifer growing arrangements are dependent upon effective communication, mutual benefits for the dairy farmer and the grazier, adequate health programmes and the integrity of the individuals involved.
Before entering into a contract grazing relationship it is important that the expectations of both parties are understood and documented and that there is an opportunity for regular communication on issues and performance.
Below are some question prompts to aid discussions with a prospective graziers or stock owners to check alignment of expectations and discuss any issues that might arise from the grazing proposal.
As well as playing a protective role, going through the contract process helps to identify and agree on the issues that are important to each party. Federated Farmers have a heifer grazing contract available for purchase on their website. DairyNZ supports the use of this contract.
Responsibilities should be agreed upon at the commencement of the grazing. Responsibilities to consider include but are not limited to:
Animal arrival
Day to day management
Health
Reproduction
Agree on the highest risk events to your circumstances and create a plan to minimise the impact the events may have on achieving liveweight targets. Examples of adverse events could include but are not limited to declared drought, flood, disease outbreak, snowstorm, other. Agree on planned realised actions from both parties involved.
Keeping a record of liveweights from each weighing will ensure that both parties are kept up to date with livestock performance.
Monthly reporting of weights, feed levels, animal health concerns, deaths, drenching and vaccination occurrences etc, will ensure that each party stays informed, and any concerns can be addressed and rectified if required.
There are many grazing fee options available. It is important that both parties agree that the fee outlined in the grazing contract is fair. Each grazing fee method has an element of risk for someone in the grazing relationship.
Flat rates are the simplest method for payment. Budgeting is straightforward: the grazier has a fixed monthly income while the stock owner has a fixed charge that could be put on automatic payment. The downside is that there is no reward or penalty for performance or incentive for improvement.
Calculation example
Grazing fee = $10/head/week over a 52 week period the cost would be $520/animal
This method directly rewards weight gained during the grazing contract. The risk to the grazier is that cost of the weight gain exceeds the weight payment or it may be expensive to maintain stock weight during the season (drought, flood, winter) without weight gain. Budgeting on the final income/cost is an unknown for both parties. Typically, the stock owner will pay a weekly dollar per head advance rate with an adjustment for liveweight gain based on dollar per kilo weight gain made quarterly or at the end of the grazing term.
Calculation example 1
Stock owner and grazier agree on $2.15 per kg Lwt gain during the grazing term and the stock owner will pay $8/head/week in an advance payment, or $416/head over 52 week grazing term.
If heifers arrive at the grazier weighing 190kg on the 1 May and are returned to the stock owner on 30 May weighing 420kg, the weight gain over the term was 230kg.
230kg x $2.15 = $494.50/head for weight gained at grazing minus $416 of the advance payment, the stock owner would pay the difference of $78.50/head at the end of the grazing term. Alternatively, the adjustment could occur every quarter or after every weighing.
Calculation example 2
Stock owner and grazier agree on $2.15 per kg Lwt gain during the grazing term and the stock owner will pay $8/head/week in an advance payment, or $416/head over 52 week grazing term.
If heifers arrive at the grazier weighing 190kg on the 1 May and are returned to the stock owner on 30 May weighing 370kg, the weight gain over the term was 180kg.
180kg x $2.15 = $387/head for weight gained at grazing, with an advance of $416, the grazier would reimburse the stock owner $29/head at the end of the grazing term.
The base rate with a performance bonus option seeks to capture the benefits of the standard weekly rate in terms of security for the grazier along with motivation or reward for stock growth similar to $/kg Lwt gain. The bonus is paid out by meeting or exceeding the set target at the end of the grazing term. It can also be broken up over quarters to reward meeting targets throughout the grazing term.
Calculation example 1
The stock owner and grazier agree that the grazing rate is $9/head/week over a 52 week term. The targeted weight at the end of the grazing term is 400kg, for all the animals that meet or exceed the 400kg threshold there is a bonus payment of $25/head. If 80 out of 100 animals reach the 400kg then the bonus payment would be 80 animals x $25/hd bonus = $2,000 that the stock owner owes the grazier.
Alternatively the performance payment can be allocated on kilo of liveweight basis on an individual or mob level.
Calculation example 2
The stock owner and grazier agree that the grazing rate is $9/head/week over a 52 week term for 100 animals. The targeted weight at the end of the grazing term is 400kg, a bonus payment of $1.25kg Lwt is paid for every kilo that the mob average exceeds the target.
If the final average weight of the mob is 415kg, then 15kg is eligible for the performance payment. The bonus would be calculated at $1.25kg Lwt x 15kg = $18.75 x 100 animals = $1,800 bonus payment for the mob.
Alternatively, the performance payment could be distributed times the number of animals that meet or exceed the target weight. If 80 out of 100 animals achieved the target weight then the bonus would be calculated $18.75 x 80 animals = $1,500 bonus is due the grazier.
Cents per kilo of DM eaten is based on the estimated feed intake of the animal during the grazing term from the arrival and exit weight. Feed is valued at cents per kg of dry matter and the stock owner is charged for estimated feed eaten. Feed management software or a spreadsheet is necessary to estimate feed intakes based on liveweight gain. This method typically has a payment system similar to kilo of liveweight gain with an advance payment and an adjustment at the end of the grazing term.
Calculation example
The stock owner and grazier agree that feed eaten will be paid at 21 cents per kg dry matter. Stock arrive at 3 months of age at 100kg and exit at 22 months of age at 450kg: feed eaten estimates are 3,930kgDM x 21 cents = $786 per head over the grazing term.
Each grazing company will have their own methods for calculating grazing fees that may include: penalties, bonuses, seasonal feed supply, drought declaration, weighing, animal health insurance or service bulls. All grazing company fees will include their administration and management costs.
A third party should add measurable value for the service they provide over a self-sourced and a self-managed grazing relationship. If grazing companies are involved then sourcing grazing, animals meeting targets, resolving disagreements, timely action, proactive monitoring should be better and easier than doing the job yourself.
Despite best intentions there may be times when some aspect of the stock owner/grazier relationship is not progressing as anticipated. This is often due either to a lack of clarity around expectations or poor communication.
It can be hard to know where to start when having these conversations, but it is important to address problems before they escalate to a point where heifers are adversely affected, or the relationship breaks down completely.
Spending some time identifying the problem, gathering facts and planning your approach will help to ensure that the matter is resolved in a positive way.
The negotiation model can be used to work through problem resolution.
Underweight stock
This problem can happen in three different situations; when calves arrive at a grazier and have their first weighing (ie. calves that should have been 120-130kg are just over 100kg); during a grazing contract tenure a large portion of youngstock slip below target liveweight at a critical time or for subsequent weighings; or when stock arrive home from grazing when a weight gain contract or regular monitoring process has not been used.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Payment or invoice concerns
Sometimes expectations are not meet when receiving and paying invoices.
Graziers may find discrepancies in the amount paid relative to the invoice, late payments being made or payments being withheld due to an unresolved dispute.
Stock owners may receive unexpected invoices from a 3rd party for vet services, supplies, feed etc.
Those on liveweight gain contracts may find that invoices from their grazier have excessive (unplanned) weight gain on a kg/lwt contract.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Adverse events
The nature of farming brings exposure to adverse climatic events such as drought, flood, snow, lightning strike, etc. Herds are also exposed to potential disease outbreak (TB, Theileria), and animal health issues on crops and pastures (brassica toxicity, nitrate poisoning, ryegrass staggers).
All of these events will have an impact on feed required, feeding infrastructure, animal health, growth targets and stock losses.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Stock losses
Minimal stock losses are a part of farming but it is important that these are communicated in a timely manner and strategies are in place to prevent significant numbers of cattle deaths.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Identifying animal health concerns
Livestock require constant monitoring, treatment and preventative animal health management carried out. Some individuals or mobs may suffer injury, ill-thrift (un-diagnosed), metabolic challenges, nutritional deficiencies, worm burden, TB reactors. If these are not identified quickly, remedied and prevention strategies carried out, then liveweight targets can be compromised.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Implementing mating plans
Graziers are requested to carry-out the mating strategy for the R2yr heifers. Sometimes communication of expectations is not clear enough. Sometimes the execution of the strategy is not accurate enough. Monitoring and communication to adjust the plan is essential.
Some challenges arise with queries at a visit to the stock about the bulls – supply, quality and quantity. This might include visual queries about size/ breed/health if they are supplied by the grazier.
Most issues arise with the retrospective analysis of PD results, mis-matings (early/late, wrong bull), execution of bull ratio, implementation of PSM date.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Setting liveweight targets
It can be difficult if both parties cannot agree on suitable liveweight targets for a mob of stock. This may also include targets at critical times and target liveweight gain/hd/day during set periods.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Providing weigh data
If your grazing contract is based on weight gain the frequency, consistent method, timeliness, accuracy and missed weighings can be a source of disagreement.
If data is being sent late or in an un-useable format this can cause frustrations.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Fit for purpose infrastructure
In order to weigh or carrying out animal health treatments graziers require suitable yarding and race infrastructure to keep people safe and allow efficient work. Stock need to be safe and comfortable moving through lanes, in yards, paddocks and when in vet races and loading ramps. Challenges may arise when stock escape, are injured or when stock owners are challenged by the working environment.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Animal care practices
When visiting youngstock you may come across evidence of substandard animal handling procedures including ill treatment, hard dogs, mob size (too big), broken tails, broken limbs/contusions/sprains, etc.
As a grazier you may receive stock that appears fearful, difficult to yard and show physical evidence of abusive management.
Both parties are obliged to address these issues.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Completing stock inventory
When animals are grazing off the dairy platform we rely on each other to ensure that animals are correctly identified at all times, and that NAIT requirements being meet, with the right animal in the right herd. Frustrations can arise when animals do not have their correct ID and when they are not in the right mob.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share
3. Propose - Links to relevant information
Changing contract timeframes
Sometime more or less stock than expected arrive in a mob.
Challenging climatic conditions mean that the length of grazing tenure may be requested at short notice to be adjusted (either shortened so that youngstock can be feed better on the dairy platform, or extended to allow more feed to be allocated to milking cows)
Individual financial situation may also require a negotiation around the tenure of the grazing period mid-season.
All these situations make it hard to budget both feed and finances at a farm business level.
1. Prepare - accessing relevant info
2. Discuss - example questions to ask/statements to share